When I went to college to learn the craft of fiction, the prevailing attitude was that the short story was a stepping stone to the novel. The short story was where the young writer could serve out her clumsy apprenticeship in the sandbox making mud pies until sufficiently skilled to create the multi-tiered cake of the novel which people would actually buy. Chekov, Joyce, and other masters of the short story aside, you could never arrive as a writer of fiction unless you published a novel.
Then I heard Raymond Carver read at Old Dominion University’s annual literary festival. Not only was “Feathers” unlike any story I had ever read, Raymond Carver was not a novelist. He was a living, breathing master of the short story. His short stories were so powerful he didn’t need to write novels.
But still, I wanted to write a novel. The first one I attempted was actually an abortive novel, rather than a failed novel. Damage Control told the story of the breakup of a marriage from alternating points of view: the young, shell-shocked wife and her equally troubled young husband. The narrative pretty much collapsed under its own weight, and I gave up on the whole thing. I subsequently tried to get control of it by paring it down into a novella, but it never gained any traction, and I gave up on that version, too.
Years later, I think the problem with Damage Control was that I didn’t have the skill as a writer to sustain a book-length narrative, and I didn’t have the life experience to pull off the husband’s point of view. Who knows? Maybe now I do.
My next attempt at a novel was driven in part by the desire to focus on writing a book, which would take longer to finish, send out, and get rejected than a short story. (Hey, I’m just being honest here.) This novel went through a series of pretentiously lame titles that I won’t repeat here. (I don’t want to be that honest.) I did complete the novel, and I didn’t give up on it for a very long time.
When the light finally dawned, I realized that the whole was less than the sum of its parts because of an episodic structure that includes a series of vignettes triggered by old photographs. The main character is an elderly woman who has disposed of all her furniture and household goods to move to an assisted living facility. She then refuses to leave her house until she has sorted through all of the personal effects of family members who had passed on before her.
The basic conflict seemed like a compelling idea, but, again, I didn’t have the skill to sustain a book-length narrative, particularly a book-length narrative of someone who is by herself for the majority of the novel’s ongoing time. Then there were all those random dead relatives who kept popping up for no apparent reason, other than once having had their pictures taken.
In the final analysis, the parts weren’t all bad, as six of the chapters from this failed novel have been published as stand-alone stories.
Ok, so having a failed novel can be a good thing! You got 6 stories out of it that were published. That’s definitely putting a positive spin on something that a lot of people might be really upset about.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I learned an incredible amount about long-form structure as well–how not to do it! I consider that knowledge a win.
LikeLike
Congratulations on lessons learned and the rewards of perseverance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Derrick. It’s been so interesting watching how my writing and my attitudes toward it have changed and evolved over such a long period of years now (40?!?!).
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was thinking of individual stories for your second one and then you finally spoke of it. I think the fact that we can critically look back at our own work speaks a lot about how far we have come.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it does–but at the same time I don’t regret a minute of writing that failed novel. It was a lot of fun. And what I’ve been able to salvage and repurpose from it has surprised me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do like your “Just being honest”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Paul. Sometimes I do need to publicly acknowledge my writerly pretensions (just not all of them). 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
You sure do 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
One thing I do love about this world, is the amount of talent out there, and the process of trying to figure out how to live (or make a living) with those talents. I’ve known a few musicians who share similar stories with you on this ~ the battle of creating something special is worthwhile when you walk away from one piece of work with more wisdom and it leads to other unexpected victories and with that a smile of knowing you did well 🙂 Great post, Liz.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much! I went down the road of having a day job career to support my writing, so that I would have complete artistic freedom.
LikeLike
Thanks great blogg post
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you!
LikeLike